Telekom Backs Sapura
Home ] Fokus ] Komentar ] Interest ] Arkib ] Maklumbalas ]  [Frame]


Battle over Time.Com
Telekom Backs Sapura
Swisscom
SingTel
NTT


Last Update:
10 May, 2000

The Edge
Telekom backs Sapura


It did not come as a surprise that Telekom Malaysia was one of Time Engineering Bhd group’s creditors that tried to deny the extension of court protection to Time.
Four creditors — Telekom, Uniphone Telecommunications, Universal Trustees and Aseambankers — objected last Friday when Time applied for a fifth extension of court protection under Section 176 of the Companies Act. Uniphone is a member of the Sapura group which is making a hostile bid for Time dot.Com Bhd, the telecommunications division of Time Engineering.
Observers say it will also not come as a surprise if Telekom had lobbied the government to reject Time Engineering’s debt-restructuring scheme and its acceptence of Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (SingTel) as a strategic partner in Time dotCom.
A tie-up between Time dot.Com and SingTel could cause Telekom to lose a substantial amount of telecommunications traffic between Malaysia and Singapore as SingTel would channel the traffic through Time’s fibre-optic cables instead of Telekom’s lines. It is only to be expected that Telekom would prefer Sapura to gain control of Time.
Sapura, too, will eventually probably bring a foreign strategic partner into Time dot.Com, but that is likely to be other multinational telcos rather than SingTel. According to Theedge.com, Sapura’s strategic partner will be Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa Ltd, although it now appears that the latter may enter in Act 2 of the play.
As Telekom appears in court as a creditor, it is obviously owed some money by Time but that is small change compared with the potential loss of traffic should SingTel join hands with Time.
Other Malaysian telcos like Celcom, Maxis and Digi are also likely to be creditors of Time, even though the biggest creditors are the banks. For these telcos, a quick resolution of Time’s debt-restructuring scheme is preferred because they are owed significant sums. These debts probably arose out of inter-connection fees as traffic from Time crossed into their lines.
They are unlikely to be grinning over Time’s problems considering that they are creditors. Further delays towards a restructuring scheme will, of course, keep one rival at a disadvantage, but the choice between Time’s own scheme and Sapura’s offer may be made quite soon.
If Time Engineering loses control of Time dot.Com, that would also spell the demise of SingTel’s position there. It would be a double blow for the Singapore national telco, considering that it lost embarrassingly in an earlier bid for Hong Kong Telecom.
Then, Hongkies gloated that Singapore companies are run by civil servants like Brigadier General Lee Hsien Yang, the younger son of Senior Minister Lee Kwan Yew, who heads SingTel. The local Press in Hong Kong claimed victory for its own son, Richard Li, head of Pacific Century CyberWorks (PCCW) which won the bid for Hong Kong Telecom. Hong Kong’s business community, led by entrepreneurs, outclassed Singapore’s civil servants, they trumpeted.
But the Singaporeans are not pushovers. They build cash-rich companies as opposed to the paper wealth that Li amassed. News reports late last week say SingTel could be preparing a counter-bid for Hong Kong Telecom following PCCW’s share price weakness, which damages its ability to use its currency of shares to purchase assets.
It’s a battle of tycoons and corporate titans. Here, Time’s chief Tan Sri Halim Saad is defending his turf from an unwelcome bid by Sapura’s Datuk Shahril Shamsuddin. In the regional arena, SingTel and the Li family (through Hutchison and PCCW) are using their wealth to buy into telcos in Hong Kong and Malaysia.